Reading an A/B readout
A short field guide to the four questions that separate a real result from a noisy one.
By Marco Reyes
An A/B test result is a small, expensive promise. Most readouts are read too quickly and trusted too much. The fix is four questions you ask before you read the number, not after.
The four questions
- Was the exposure large enough to see the effect you claim?
- Did the variant reach the population you said it would?
- Is the metric you are reading the metric you designed for?
- What is the cost of being wrong, and in which direction?
The first two are about validity. The third is about honesty — it is easy to read a metric that moved instead of the one you planned for. The fourth is about stakes. A 1% lift on a low-stakes metric is not the same as a 1% lift on a high-stakes one.
A readout you can defend is worth ten you can only celebrate.
In the cohort we run a live readout with the group and grade it against these four questions. It is the single exercise that changes how people read results afterwards.
More reading
- The pipeline after the notebook — 7 min
- Design systems nobody uses — 6 min